Quote from: SmoothCurves on January 15, 2015, 06:13:04 PM

Quote from: sgbett on January 06, 2015, 10:28:32 PM

Quote from: xDan on January 06, 2015, 08:55:10 PM

Quote from: riiiiising on January 06, 2015, 06:30:12 PM

I created this account "riiiising" because all my others were being banned for warning others against the incoming drop in price from $600, $500, $400, etc.

...

The only way I was able to stick around was by pretending to be an over the top caricature of a bull, at which point I then was able to get my message across again. I have been warning others about this drop for a very long time.

so "riiiiising" == "falllling"

I called it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=865366.msg9604488#msg9604488

And for context on how he plays both sides and runs his sockpuppets:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=865366.0

The evidence is strong in this one!

A Chart you might find interesting: https://www.tradingview.com/v/dHbn7XZ4/

That is an interesting chart! I think it it will serve people well to remember that outsized moves in bitcoin happen seem to happen in both directions. Which was the point of the post.

It's easy to say when we are at 1200 that we'll go back to 200 before we go back up, and feel confident that the correction to 200 is natural and the subsequent rise is inevitable because how else will it capture x% of global remittance (which is the 'success' endgame scenario) and usurp broken currencies. To do this, it will have to grow exponentially in terms of market cap (and hence price).

When we are actually at 200 its much harder to maintain that belief!