Quote from: dinofelis on January 08, 2015, 07:53:37 AM

Quote from: NotLambchop on January 07, 2015, 08:17:49 PM

When did France agree to you living there without paying taxes? I hope you saved the contract, because France tells me she didn't.

Since I live on tax payer money :-)

Ok, they give me some, and take some back, but I live net, partly, on the French (and partly on British, and German, and ...) taxpayer's hard-earned money :-)

Before, I produced wealth and earned money. But states took a big part of that away and I didn't want to be in slavery. Now, I'm on the other side of the fence, where I produce almost nothing (of any value on the market), and live good on other people's stolen production. I don't really think that is good, but it is better to steal, than to be stolen. Given that in a pseudo-communist system, it is one or the other, and there is no fair earning what you produce, it is better to be on the state's theft side. So that's what I do.

However, your point is a logical fallacy. You compared "paying taxes" to "paying rent when you live in a house". I pointed out to you where that comparison fails:
1) living in a house for rent is a mutual agreement, while paying taxes isn't.

No. France has never agreed to you your living there without paying taxes. If you were born at my house, would you feel entitled to live at my house for the rest of your life? Do you feel that you have a right to live in the maternity ward of the hospital where you were born for free? How is that different from living in France without paying for it?

Quote

2) living "on earth" (so, in a country) is not the same thing as "living in a house" because earth is not a produced good that belongs to someone, contrarily to a house. Living on earth is a natural state of affairs, like breathing the air is. For many reasons, the country is not owned by a bunch of people calling themselves a state, no more than the air in the forrest is my property and no more than I could ask money for somebody who is breathing.
Only the result of production can ideally be owned.

Then owning a piece of land is a crime against nature. It is as repugnant as owning the air above that land. In short, GET OFF MY LAWN, capitalist imperialist running dog pig Angry