Quote from: sevenyears26 on January 09, 2015, 03:39:23 PM

Quote from: rockethead on January 09, 2015, 03:28:43 PM

Quote from: martismartis on January 09, 2015, 11:02:00 AM

Quote from: oldisoft on January 09, 2015, 10:28:03 AM

Quote from: Simakki on January 09, 2015, 10:11:35 AM

Quote from: martismartis on January 09, 2015, 09:26:03 AM

Quote from: rockethead on January 09, 2015, 08:55:51 AM

Quote from: martismartis on January 09, 2015, 08:00:49 AM

Regarding exchanges after launch: are there some plans to use NXT MGW as exchange? If multisig will be ready, I think we need get rid off centralized exchanges and add NEM to MGW.

You mean NEM MGW?

It could be NEM MGW, of course. But there is working NXT MGW and I think 50% of Nemsters also using NXT.

I prefer to work on behalf NEM MGW rather than stuck with NXT... People who already had used NXT could have bought NEM from NX AE. This time it should be the opposite way.

Absolutely agree with! We get tired of the stuck with NXT

But Pat wrote, that NEM core devs will not have time for this. So what is the solution other, than use NXT MGW at the begining? Do you have one?
NXT/Supernet multigateway is a working solution and I think NXT/Supernet devs will help with NEM implementation in MGW.

I am not sure if NXT MGW is a working solution or not with this : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nsC0fEqqjKS8J8edm22bPtOvTcQsIvt41vP3O8xtON4/edit?pli=1#gid=0

NEM core devs may not have time. But surprises can come from elsewhere. We don't know for sure. But NEM's multisig shall put it in a much better position to manage the concerns of an MGW.

That's why all the more important why Multisig is a must for any crypto 2.0 roll out.

Yup this is exactly why we need multisig. Scary stuff

We have learnt time after time from exchanges and scams and devs that got "hacked" that multi-sig is now a requirement for any crypto to be taken seriously. If devs aren't putting it in their crypto, maybe it is because a "hack" is planned in the future.