Quote from: Clambooya on January 16, 2015, 09:42:35 AM

Quote from: james.lent on January 16, 2015, 09:38:36 AM

Quote from: Clambooya on January 16, 2015, 09:14:59 AM

Quote from: dyask link=topic
Op471.msg10173129#msg10173129 date=1421398681

Quote from: Clambooya on January 16, 2015, 08:27:13 AM

Quote from: dyask on January 16, 2015, 08:15:42 AM

Quote from: Clambooya on January 16, 2015, 07:36:26 AM

lol, your talking about honesty in ponzi schemes. Thats rich.

And that is a problem. If the players are dishonest, it makes the game much more risky.

how was I dishonest? I risked 14btc but got back paid double in luck.
I took risk of 14 btc total loss.

You got back extra payments because of a bug in the script. Keeping the extra payments is dishonest. You should have only received 14 * 1.3 BTC, or 18.2 BTC. The 4.2 BTC was the reward. Anything above that would be returned if you are honest. https://twitter.com/RealWeeklyPonzi/status/555979373707141121

OP is dishonest for writing such a poor faulty script. And telling us it works.
I have sent 14 btc total and received 26.6btc back in total in several single investments. Could have lost all. Took the risk.
You must complain to OP not some investor like me who did nothing more than invest!

That's so much more extra. How is he dishonest ? it was an issue with blockchain. If he was like you, he would have ran away with that 100btc. Nuff said.

it was issue with his poor script not blockchain. Blockchain only do transactions the script tells to do.
Maybe he did not Understand blockchain API properly.

it was an issue which he had rectified. do the right thing

by the way, an idiot spammed 0.05btc deposits without fee's . Noobs.