Quote from: michaeladair on January 17, 2015, 02:05:07 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 17, 2015, 02:01:32 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on January 17, 2015, 01:53:11 AM

Quote from: BadBear on December 18, 2014, 07:56:09 AM

Quote from: Mabsark on December 16, 2014, 09:01:44 AM

Quote from: BadBear on December 16, 2014, 06:42:38 AM

Given that the topic of this thread is your feedback against those companies, and that it depends on circumstances changing (being able to prove they aren't a ponzi), I would think you would jump at the chance to show you are trustworthy and fair with your ratings, and that you do intend to change feedback as circumstances change. Being in default trust network doesn't mean everyone trusts you, just that the one person who put you on their list does.

I've already proven that I'm willing to remove feedback by removing feedback from nexusmining. Like I said, I've reached out to der_troll who has simply ignored my PM's. I'm willing to remove that negative feedback, der_troll just has to be willing to do the same and get in touch with me.

Looks like you succeeded in using default trust in order to coerce someone else into removing their negative feedback against you. Good for you. That makes you and CanaryInTheMine look like upstanding people who definitely deserve to be in the default trust network, and certainly doesn't lend any credence to other claims that may or may not be true /s.

Well technically speaking he did not succeed, and I used my words/logic to get him to remove his trust on me.

Hopefully he will see that this is not the first time he has done this and will remove him.

I clearly stated that the removal of the negative trust was due to my opinion changing and of no help from you. I do not believe in your logic still.

"Negative trust removed, not because of this thread but due to a change in opinion of mine: reference"

Well either way, you intent was still of that to coerce me into getting me to stop leaving negative trust to people who I though were scamming.