Quote from: georgem on January 17, 2015, 08:20:41 AM

Quote from: timedelay on January 17, 2015, 08:18:38 AM

Quote from: georgem on January 17, 2015, 08:13:11 AM

Quote from: Mr. Spread on January 17, 2015, 08:02:18 AM

Quote from: georgem on January 17, 2015, 06:36:45 AM

if we wanna attract a lot of new people and immediately create a big network of masternodes, why not get rid of any requirement.

I am even thinking about none at all, ZERO, NADA.

Not 1 SPR as I said before.... better yet, why not 0 SPR.

Grin

(I am serious)

We'll need some minimum amount just to protect form potential DoS attack at launch, we don't want someone to try to create millions of masternodes.

... and those millions of masternodes will immediately be shut down (not allowed to continue) by the protocol, because of the 1000 masternodes which have more then zero SPR in them, right?
Aren't all those zero-spr-masternodes going to communicate with the network, recieve the list of the top 1000 masternodes and quietly shut themselves down since they have too few SPR in them?

Where exactly will the Ddosing happen? Constantly asking to send the list of the top 1000 allowed masternodes? Is this transmitted data going to be what bloats/attacks the system?

Mr.Spread plz tell us some minimun requirements for MS now.

Let's think this thru first, we can't make decisions on the fly like that.

I think Mr.Spread can publish some key specs about MN ,then let the community discuss .