Quote from: Rum152 on January 18, 2015, 11:30:20 PM

Quote from: Honeypot on January 18, 2015, 10:39:11 PM

HAHAHA now we are down to you saying 'SCAMMM' when obviously you are just trying to bitch and moan about an argument.

No. I am pointing out specific facts about your loan request. My previous post did not mention the word 'scam' you reached that conclusion by yourself.

Quote from: Honeypot on January 18, 2015, 10:39:11 PM

Now that is an interesting, delusional claim

I have set even looser conditions in the past for all my loans, and what a surprise, they are all repaid in full Cheesy

In what ways were other conditions you set for your previous loans looser? Your other loans were repaid because the value of your shitcoin did not decline in value.

Quote from: Honeypot on January 18, 2015, 10:39:11 PM

I have already explained above why risks and benefits exist for both sides, and no one is disputing this fact aside from you who want to squeal 'scam' in an effort to bitch at a deal that you have no place mouthing off about with your 'opinions' (just an excuse to bitch as anyone can see - no one gave you permission to do so in someone else's business because you got a mouth to work with) Cheesy

No you have not. You have explained zero risks that you are taking on.

Quote from: Honeypot on January 18, 2015, 10:39:11 PM

I am offering a collateral in an asset that has endured past longer than a year, certainly longer then you have been here, while surviving attacks and accusations from all quarters by a publicly known developer with identity revealed since day 1. --snip-

So you are saying that people are actively trying to attack your scam coin while you are giving it up as collateral? Don't you think that might be something you might want to disclose to potential lenders? If an attacker were to become successful then the price of NOBL would probably decline.

Quote from: Honeypot on January 18, 2015, 10:39:11 PM

Volatility of the market would make liquidation arrangement too risky unless specific terms are agreed upon, and I have worked with individual clients about adding additional collateral in a way we both agree on, which you obvious got no place voicing yourself.

This is why you offer collateral equal to at least 120% of the amount of the loan. This allows there to be some level of volatility in the market without forcing the liquidation of your shitcoin.

Quote from: Honeypot on January 18, 2015, 10:39:11 PM

Chances of lender being repaid, thus far with many of my other loans, have been 100%, no less Cheesy

Anyone who makes this kind of claim is lying. And is probably a scam

Quote from: Rum152 on January 18, 2015, 10:14:02 PM

Here is the thing: you cannot accept that your loan is a scam. Despite the fact that it has been proven to be as such. You refuse to give any evidence that you will be at risk by giving your collateral to escrow.

Now this bitch can't even remember what he wrote few minutes ago LOL

Only for this bitch, he is to lend twice the amount for half the collateral so mitigate my risks and potential loss of profits should btc tank below 100 and collateral double within the next few months

Fair's fair, eh?