Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 19, 2015, 01:52:06 PM

Quote from: inBitweTrust on January 19, 2015, 01:48:12 PM

So if BCNext wants to pull a Satoshi that is fine but the code should be developed in a more transparent manner after he has stepped aside.

I see yet another flaw in your reasoning. You assume that a known identity helps to protect a system against scams, but history of cryptocurrencies shows the opposite. Have you even heard of Pirate@40? (And should I mention Josh Garza?)

Non-sequitur, as we are discussing other security weaknesses and you are moving the goal posts.

Additionally, you are presenting a false dichotomy even after I bolded:

Quote from: inBitweTrust on January 19, 2015, 01:48:12 PM

Having a transparent development process with known developers absolutely does not eliminate all bugs and malicious code from entering in the software,

Hint:
A rational argument would present evidence which reflected increases in overall security weaknesses from a transparent development process to counteract my claims.