I wasn't the one to start using ad hominem.

There are actually two distinct constructs at play here, they are not equivalent. Consider:

Me.

Quote

Your argument makes no sense, you defend central planning, and therefore you're a socialist fuckwit.

You.

Quote

You're this, and that, also lalalalala I can't hear all the sense you make because it goes against my conviction of being entitled to free stuff.

An empty post filled with a strawman "you defend central planning", an ad hominem "socialist fuckwit", and another strawman "being entitled". Bravo!