Quote from: tvbcof on January 20, 2015, 04:51:25 PM

Quote from: outahere on January 20, 2015, 09:35:17 AM

Quote from: tvbcof on January 20, 2015, 09:20:09 AM

Quote from: outahere on January 20, 2015, 09:02:27 AM

...

Quote

but like anything it needs to be implemented fairly

It was announced in a white paper long before its public release and is open source. That's about as fair as you can get in the real world. It's usefulness is upgraded through an open source system. Anyone that has the best scientific research to achieve peer-reviewed consensus contributes to the optimization of usefulness.

Who's quote is that? It's not mine. If it's your own invention then you are basically forgot to pull the shades before playing with yourself and I've little interest in being involved in the endeavor.

Your mistake here, I quoted you verbatim.
DO NOT POST SESC LINKS #top

Ah, Fonzie's bogus URL trick. Not as common as your 'false-strawman' on the other thread though. The new cbeast is plumbing the depths for sure.

Good morning class. Yesterday we derived the chances of a thread spanning more than 10 pages and not containing a false-strawman assertion. In today's class we will talk about the ethics of retaining a 'Donator' tag when buying an old forum personna.

If you legitimately did screw up the URL and are trying to indicate that "fairly carefully" and "fairly" are the same thing (then go on to give a dissertation about 'fairness') that's pretty weak sauce.

I did not check the URL. You implied that I somehow edited your post which I didn't. Wow, I am so impressed at your cleverness to look at my post history. Hey, this forum has changed rules about newbie posting, so I see no point in names anymore. I'll just use whatever name I feel like in protest.

Quote

If you legitimately did screw up the URL and are trying to indicate that "fairly carefully" and "fairly" are the same thing (then go on to give a dissertation about 'fairness') that's pretty weak sauce.

Your right. Your wishy-washy statements like this are meaningless. Instead they should be mocked and derided. My mistake. I won't give you the benefit of a doubt next time.