Quote from: Hellot on January 20, 2015, 09:19:28 PM

Quote from: WoodCollector on January 20, 2015, 08:43:58 PM

Quote from: danielpbarron on January 20, 2015, 08:31:39 PM

Six times in this post, you make an appeal to "the community." You're part of the plague called socialism. I wonder if anyone on this forum realizes that it's always the scammers who cry community.

Difference is, i'm posting videos soon to show i am not a scammer and Nubbins is an unprofessional virus to Bitcoin culture. But thanks for sharing your insight with us.

You're being too emotional here, and that's probably the first proof that you're an artist invested in their work. But you cannot come down on anyone here for questioning and using the system that is in place. It's not perfect, but it's what we have and it works. The dialogue here is proof of that.

All of the points raised in the original thread are valid and I was astonished this was even an issue since I always assumed these where cut by a machine. If I was you, and you really did this by hand, I would take that as a compliment.

The post by Nubbins should have been enough. He went overboard with adding negative trust based on what he felt was the truth and not the ideal truth at hand. He made a few points but none of which should have been enough to follow through with neg trust. Neither of the two are handling this the right way but cause and effect took place here. Had no negative trust been given and Nubbins brought up valid points and waited for inquiry from not only OP but from customers and those that know him, then this could have been settled and a video posted. Now its has become a shit show. I disagree completely with neg trust and think that at this moment it was abused and not because its true or untrue, but because it was a first action taken rather than the right action taken.