I would not say that being a "child" is a reason to label them as a scammer. He has his right to make any claims that he wishes. If his claims are invalid then they will be ignored.
I do think he does have a point as paul revere's claims played no small part in the bashing of woodcollector.
If the OP gave you a "bad" rating then no one will take it seriously. The OP is not on the default trust list so his claim is not going to affect you. Your claim/rating is going to be visible to everyone who looks at his profile by default. What you are doing by leaving him negative trust is to silence your critics
I did not label OP a scammer, I labeled him a shill. The scammer scams, the shill flaps his jaw.
His claims *are* invalid, and they are being mercilessly mocked instead of ignored.
I know nobody will take OP seriously, but my negative rating will hopefully serve as a warning to other shills.