Quote from: GreXX on January 24, 2015, 05:39:27 PM

Quote from: andyge on January 24, 2015, 05:12:53 PM

Quote from: GreXX on January 24, 2015, 02:59:56 PM

Can I think this is the stark fake？

To be completely honest, i'm not even sure what you're saying..

I understand now, XCR is a clone of the bts.

If that is what you got from what we said then you didn't read it correctly. However it would be fair to say that parts of the backbone infrastructure will be adaptations of the DPOS model created by the bitshares team, yes. I personally don't want to hide from that fact. I think basing our system on DPOS is a positive thing as it has proven to be one of the most influential, stable, and secure systems we have seen. I suspect you might see others taking a second look at DPOS in the next 6-12 months.

All of the other facets of Crypti that we have discussed all along are still being built and will still run on Crypti, the consensus model and network will simply be based on DPOS. This allows a scalable, secure, and equitable network to be built with much more relative ease. Why start over again from scratch when someone has already solved some of the problems we were running into and proven that it works and works wonderfully. DPOS and the success of the Bitshares network is a great advancement in the crypto space and allows for a scalable network, rewards those running the network, and that is still, for all intents and purposes, decentralized. There are some things about the way they implement delegates, reward them, and burn currency that we feel don't necessarily fit what we are doing and will be changing. But, overall, the core infrastructure will be largely based on what they have done.

Delegates are not implemented they are elected. The idea behind payd delegates is that they have to bring more value to the network than they cost, so it's not neccesarly rewarding as such but more a salary. They get hired and paid by the blockchain.
However this is only possible by inflation. The pay rate differences from 3% to 100% the difference is being burned, to bring value to the shareholders.

The inflation debate was a long one, and not everybody agreed. But I think that in the long run, that BTS with it's current inflationary DPOS system is the only self sustaining crypto project out there.

There is already PTS who has switched to DPOS, but they have chosen the deflationary model. Wich is fine because they are basically an share drop token. The main reason for the switch was that the pow chain died.

So with all this being said, I would really like to know how you envision your version of DPOS.