Quote from: smoothie on January 26, 2015, 12:08:21 AM

Quote from: SodaWarz on January 25, 2015, 11:59:52 PM

Quote from: cyrusb on January 25, 2015, 11:58:55 PM

How did he make the guide or the lines at the start of the video?

By gluing the design to the wood then tracing it with a plunger router. 30 seconds on youtube and you can see how its done. Just look it up.

LOL so you are speaking for WoodCollector?

Let's get the facts from WoodCollector in an actual video of him putting that stencil on and not just speculate.

It sure as hell was not carbon paper.

Looks like a laser to me (in my opinion).

Stop with the "know it all" comments and let's have WC post proof or stfu.

Thanks

Semantics, Pretty sure its already been covered that it was done with a router over paper not carbon paper. Yep, it's been covered already.

Quote from: Iynx on January 26, 2015, 12:17:32 AM

So when this masterpiece comes up on auction, the winning bidder should probably be informed that the middle finger WC uses comes from stock just as his other "originals" do.

http://depositphotos.com/40151223/stock-illustration-illustration-of-middle-finger.html

More Semantics, He said long before he started the piece that it was a stock image as this little project was not worth more time that a stock image on mahogany.

Glad to see we can repeat ourselves time and again with the same old semantics you were using a week ago.

Since were playing the semantics game, lets play my favorite game "here is the facts as written in the encyclopedia"

As Derivative works done in his own style his pieces are LEGALLY considered original. Dont take my word for it, ITS RIGHT HERE. So calling them original works is 100% the truth and fact. Thats not semantics, that's universally the truth