Quote from: Epsylon3 on January 26, 2015, 10:34:38 AM

Quote from: tsiv on January 26, 2015, 10:05:50 AM

Quote from: sp_ on January 26, 2015, 08:08:06 AM

I have found a bug in the hash. The problem is that tsivs code is missing verfication by the cpu before sending the results. Build 2 comming soon

Care to elaborate on the bug part? Might see if I CBA to fix it in the official release.

tsiv: I started to merge your spread code in ccminer, but without testnet or a pool, its hard to finalize it...

I added the cpu part

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/tree/spreadx11

i will rebase it on my final 1.5.2

That CPU code seems to be just the X11 part of the hash though, completely ignoring the miner signature and whole block hash? And yea, I know exactly how annoying it is to test when your only method of verification is actually solving a block. I ended up hard coding it to work on a static block of input data that I knew the correct hash for until I got the damn thing working

Well, more or less working apparently.