Quote from: nubbins on January 26, 2015, 02:11:55 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 26, 2015, 03:51:52 AM

You have demonstrated ... willingness to abuse trust for personal gain

What if they also slander you without evidence to back up their claims?

EDIT: This is just as serious an accusation as anything else being discussed here. I take my reputation seriously, and request you provide proof of me "demonstrating" willingness to abuse the forum for my personal gain. Without such proof, I'd like to ask the slanderous comment be removed.

The proof is the fact that you are willing to abuse the trust system to silence people who are proving your accusations incorrect. This serves you by you getting to preserve your reputation at the expense of others by not having to admit you were wrong after starting a mob riot against him and other users. This is clearly self serving.

Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2015, 11:44:21 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 26, 2015, 11:37:27 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 26, 2015, 11:22:19 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on January 26, 2015, 11:13:15 PM

Clearly this all revolves around the initial accusation that he was using a laser engraver, and no actual solid evidence of this has been presented, just speculation after speculation endlessly. Convenient how this is set up so the burden of proof is set upon WoodCollector and not Nubbins to provide sufficient evidence of his accusation.

I think this is speculation. I also think he has gotten much more lazy with his alts and they are acting much more like alts/socks IMO (almost to the point where he is now trolling).

This is not at all speculation. Who would have even started to try to play "scambuster" mall cop sifting around looking for any reason to speculate on endless topics regarding WoodCollector if it weren't for Nubbins's original accusation? Again, it is a simple task to accuse anyone of using alts to discredit them, and conveniently there is no way to prove this either way. THAT is what speculation is. Just a bunch of wannabe detectives overly confident in their "scambusting" skills.

WHAT IS THE PROOF? I SEE NO PROOF ONLY TONS OF SPECULATION!

I agree that the majority (maybe even all) of the evidence against WC is speculation, with the exception of him using alts to further his cause. I do trust BadBear enough to take his word for it that he personally saw proof that the alts of WC are in fact alts of WC. If you didn't trust BadBear then maybe you could ask theymos to look into it and see if he comes to the same conclusion.

BadBear is unwilling to provide this "proof" and I guarantee you Theymos doesn't care. That leaves the accusations standing only as that, accusations with no evidence.