Quote from: lamela on January 28, 2015, 02:39:33 AM

Quote from: slaveforanunnak1 on January 17, 2015, 05:08:27 AM

Quote from: Billbags on January 15, 2015, 07:59:22 AM

Quote from: slaveforanunnak1 on January 14, 2015, 08:28:51 PM

Quote from: picolo on January 13, 2015, 11:03:08 AM

Quote from: cyberpinoy on January 13, 2015, 05:08:37 AM

Quote from: slaveforanunnak1 on December 12, 2014, 05:01:47 AM

Quote from: jabo38 on December 12, 2014, 04:50:31 AM

So, I am busy right now. I scanned Nick's post. I'm glad he is writing again and the material seems pretty clearly written and on point, but which part exactly made your draw drop?

Would you care to elaborate on the connections you posted?

It is kind of hard to agree or disagree with a bunch of links.

Sure;

Nick posted again today, (praising ethereum once again;) and I was reading and I noticed his use of the term "block chain" instead of "blockchain"

http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html

Most people refer to it as blockchain (one word) as showen here by the Google trends.

http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=blockchain%2C%20block%20chain&cmpt=q

and then I naturally looked up

http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/

Satoshi never said blockchain. He calls the ledger block chain. Shocked

LOL Ths is a very interesting situation. Its amazing what kinds of things people can catch. I am now wondering myself

As I said before, I would need more than one little hint to think he is S N!

Not just "one little hint" buddy

https://likeinamirror.wordpress.com/2013/12/01/satoshi-nakamoto-is-probably-nick-szabo/

I just happen to find another one. Welcome to the party

For anyone who likes this thread...... The book in the following link is a must read Wink

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NNLWRRM/ref=aw_ss_kndl_dp/

how deep does the book go into the cypherpunk movement ?

Yeah I've read it.. It is a good read.. But I guess reading this whole thread would do the trick.

Satoshi could be nick szabo but there is probably a 1 2 or 3% chance only that it's him.