Quote from: sadpandatech on July 14, 2012, 01:41:01 AM

Quote from: psy on July 14, 2012, 01:37:07 AM

Quote from: sadpandatech on July 14, 2012, 01:32:38 AM

Quote from: psy on July 14, 2012, 01:28:10 AM

Quote from: bitcoinBull on July 14, 2012, 01:21:41 AM

Thanks. So the leaker who accessed genjix's box packed it on his box as him. That's why it says genjix/genjix, genjix's box was hacked.

genjix's box was hacked? Who told you that? Shocked

So, the simplest explanation is the one you gave and not that genjix himself leaked the source code? Roll Eyes

no one is giving an 'explanation'. We are jsut trying to trace this stuff back as close to 'source' as possible..

@BitcoinBull I assume by 'box' you mean his personal computer?

I will not give much importance to bitcoinBull's assumptions as 20 minutes ago he was assuming I was looking at the file on the OP and not at the file I had downloaded from the link at the pastebin and decoded with the instructions posted at reddit...

well, in your opinion, did it come from his gihub or his computer? And would it not be easy enough to edit that stuff to make it look like it came from a particular source?

Anything is possible. I could create a VM and have a user with the name genjix and achieve the same result.
That still doesn't give me a solution to be able to clone a private github repo, much less edit the HEAD file to include genjix name on it, for I would need to clone the repo first Grin