Quote from: Vandroiy on July 14, 2012, 10:57:13 AM

This is actually the only viable argument here. Is the laundry too slow? We have about 7200 coins produced daily, what fraction might it get?

As an example, 6% of hashpower over 100 days yield 43200 BTC. That's becoming interesting. If it is able to use 20% of hashpower -- well, then there's little question, with 100k BTC in 70 days! So, can someone persuade me there's not enough hashpower there? The gpumax thread looks pretty long for a minor operation, if I may say.

Dude, you're borderline idiot. It ISN'T the only argument just because you haven't thought of the others. Seriously, you want people to do all the thinking for you while you just spew bullshit.

As giga and I already explained, hashing on GPUmax hasn't been 24x7. In the beginning it was higher priced and it was more steady for two reasons.. there were fewer miners in the system so it took longer to get through jobs and because the market price hadn't settled yet. One large miner could put a stupid high price in and bring up the system average. That is no longer the case. Once again you guys are making estimates based on FUBAR evidence. Your estimates factor in GPUmax running 24x7, but instead its running maybe 1x5. Nowhere near enough to launder the amount of coins you think pirate needs to launder.

Here's the next thing for you to consider, but you seriously need to consider it. I will repeat this post over and over until you do.

How is this guy paying 110% https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60717.0 ?

Next, how are any of the other pools that were around paying 110%?

Next, why have many pools switched from Prop to PPS or some other averaged system?

Once you figure that, you'll realize you owe pirate an apology. Seeing how you shittalk though, I doubt that will ever actually ever happen because you don't have the balls for it.