Quote from: turvarya on February 04, 2015, 04:32:29 PM

Wouldn't it be bad for Bitcoin, when transactions are happening somewhere(an altcoin?) else?
Spammy microtransactions are those with smaller fees aren't they? So more transactions means higher fee. So, it will lead to private people stopping to use Bitcoin, since they can't afford transactions.
Isn't small fees one of the main arguments for Bitcoin?
Tell me, how wouldn't that lead to higher fees?

Obviously we don't share the same vision of the future, maybe that's the problem.
Can you explain to me why microtransation MUST occure on the bitcoin chain secured with huge and expensive hashpower?

Quote from: R2D221 on February 04, 2015, 04:35:00 PM

Quote from: balu2 on February 04, 2015, 04:29:14 PM

Quote from: R2D221 on February 04, 2015, 04:27:17 PM

Oh, fuck. So you ARE one of those people that think climate change is not real. There's no point arguing with you, then.

-ad hominem
-i did not say that
-you are offtopic

you lost the argument threefold

I never said your argument was invalid because you were a climate change denier.

If you don't think climate change is real but neither that it's fake, then what do you think?

i never said anything about climate change deying and in fact i don't even care because this discussion isn't about the weather. You want to start a discussion about climatechange now? Seriously?