Quote from: Buffer Overflow on February 05, 2015, 09:04:43 AM

Quote from: homo homini lupus on February 05, 2015, 08:49:21 AM

Does it hurt your feelings?

No, I'm not Gavin.

So why do you then speak on his behalf?

Quote from: Buffer Overflow on February 05, 2015, 09:04:43 AM

Quote from: homo homini lupus on February 05, 2015, 08:49:21 AM

Mr. Overflow your style of argumentations is manipulative at best - same as most of the other pro-forkers'.

I'm not the one trying to spin it around that the removal of the cap (which was the original game plan all along) isn't the "real" bitcoin.

Removal of the cap isn't the problem. Forking without consensus is. And there isn't a consensus for many good reasons.

Quote from: solex on February 05, 2015, 09:05:53 AM

Quote from: homo homini lupus on February 05, 2015, 08:49:21 AM

Say coins in adress x move on gavincoin fork. Same transaction could be broadcast on MPcoin fork by anyone and vice versa.

In that scenario:
If the utxo for x comes from an MPcoin block before the fork then the tx is discarded as a double-spend.
If the utxo for x comes from an MPcoin block after the fork then the tx is discarded due to unrecognized inputs.

You are looking at it wrong. Transactions are signed with privatekeys. Same adresses have same privatekeys on both networks. Mpcoin nodes don't have to communicate with Gavincoin nodes to doublicate the transactions.

Transactions don't have to be douplicated but they potentially can be by anyone who wants to. It's going to be an epic mess.