Quote from: ranlo on February 06, 2015, 05:54:33 PM

Quote from: crypto4jan on February 06, 2015, 05:29:18 PM

Quote from: curT on February 06, 2015, 03:10:22 PM

Quote from: crypto4jan on February 06, 2015, 02:59:58 PM

But paying ENRG from my own funds to other people when they are online I have no intention.

You don't have to pay with your funds.

Change this:

Quote from: energycr on April 29, 2014, 12:49:11 PM

EnergyCoin Specifications

Algorithm: Scrypt POS/PoW Hybrid (No PoW Reward)
Max Coins: 110 Million and yearly interests.
Year 1: 10% interest 11 000 000 ENRG created here
Year 2: 8%
Year 3: 6%
Year 4: 4%
Year 5: 2%
Next : 1%

to this:

Quote from: curT on February 06, 2015, 10:30:27 AM

I don't know whether it is technically possible ,
maybe something like this?

Algorithm: the most energysaving
Money Supply now: 110 000 000
Max money Supply: unlimited
Each hour 1000 ENRG will be sent out to wallets that have been online for the past hour. (if 10 wallets are online, every wallet will receive 100 ENRG)
ENRG supply year: 1000*24*365=8 760 000

Clear! I think it is also more fair . Reward is limited to 1000 ENRG regardless of how many coins you have.
If this is posible I vote for this.
It is good for the network .

I don't like this idea... it basically means there's no reason to hold coins anymore. Just open empty wallets on each device you have and you get the maximum number of coins allowed. Since it isn't based on how many you hold, there's no reason not to continually dump them at that point.

Holding coins only for getting more?
What if you have more coins with less value?
The value is important not the quantity?
As I said:
The idea behind this distribution is to involve more people in Energycoin --> more ideas, more help to devlope the coin/project.
The more people involved, more likely to succeed your project --> possibly more value.

More opinions about this?