Quote from: Muuurrrrica! on February 08, 2015, 12:17:16 AM

Quote from: DooMAD on February 07, 2015, 11:52:03 PM

Quote from: MuuurrrricaPopescu on February 07, 2015, 11:28:59 PM

Quote from: homo homini lupus on February 06, 2015, 11:49:00 PM

Quote from: D05GTO on February 06, 2015, 11:42:37 PM

Dumb post by someone who couldn't even bother to read the Bitcoin Whitepaper. Here's a snippet for the uninformed.

"
Long before the network gets anywhere near as large as that, it would be safe for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section Cool to check for double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or about 12KB per day. Only people trying to create new coins would need to run network nodes. At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware. A server farm would only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with that one node.

The bandwidth might not be as prohibitive as you think. A typical transaction would be about 400 bytes (ECC is nicely compact). Each transaction has to be broadcast twice, so lets say 1KB per transaction. Visa processed 37 billion transactions in FY2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. That many transactions would take 100GB of bandwidth, or the size of 12 DVD or 2 HD quality movies, or about $18 worth of bandwidth at current prices.
If the network were to get that big, it would take several years, and by then, sending 2 HD movies over the Internet would probably not seem like a big deal.

Satoshi Nakamoto
"

Important parts are highlighted.
Nowhere did satoshi say to raise blocklimit ahead of demand 20-fold.

This would imply that you'll be in favour of a fork when we do come close to hitting the 1MB limit then? Could have sworn you weren't in favour of a fork under any circumstances. Roll Eyes

I would be in favour of a fork as soon as the blocklimit starts making trouble - but by then still not 20-fold.

I don't think hitting the limit will even produce any big trouble for a long time. I think btc could operate within 5 MB blocks for the next 3 to 5 years (or even longer) without slowing down adoption even a little.

I think Gavin must have something in his water that affects his brain.

---------

Actually no fork would be necessary at all, if people would just start entertaining the multi-chain solution a bit more.

its impressive how bitcoiners are 100% found of themselves..

like if 7Bn people are gonna use bitcoin.. or at least its core..

or even pretending to cope with VISA or whatever other paper shit system.

seriously take a deep breath FFS.

All i can see is devs/economists wanabees, thinking they read enough BS over the internet to formulate an opinion..

well no way: bitcoin = decentralization.

And if we were to reach a consensus about that astro-bloating, ima sell errthing and move on for i'd be quite worried regarding bitcoin's alleged decentralization..