Quote from: geegaw on February 08, 2015, 12:09:20 AM

Surely you jest?

What an utter waste of time. What, something like this "hey josh why do you lie so much" 'no I don't".

Good god man.

Ask Josh the pathological liar con-man questions in written form.

Like his debate with theMage.

Stupid and pointless exercise.

You weren't expecting him to tell the truth this time were you? Just because he "approached" you.

Honestly, I don't expect anything. Still, to be fair, I offered him a chance to answer questions with PROOF. If the questions are returned with a bunch of BS, and nothing solid, then I don't expect anyone here would be surprised.

That said, if he can truly disprove any of the accusations, then it is only fair to give them that chance. The confusion, and uncertainty surrounding GAW helps nothing. If this clears up even a small portion of that, then great.

Quote from: cryptofunk on February 08, 2015, 12:10:45 AM

Quote from: Coin Brief on February 08, 2015, 12:02:45 AM

If anyone has legitimate questions they would like to ask Josh Garza, go here and fill out the form: http://coinbrief.net/questions-for-gaw-crowdsourced/

Please make sure that the questions you are sending are legitimate...as in, there is evidence to show that something GAW has said was wrong, there are documents / images that have not been addressed, etc.

Josh reached out to me after our last article, and when I asked if he would be willing to answer questions, and provide evidence to back it up, he agreed. So, I'm crowdsourcing it.

Sounds more like a fishing expedition for evidence, a one way discovery.

I would prefer this to be shared in a real "legal discovery", at least then there will be an obligation to share... what you're suggesting now is nothing more than a way to avoid a "real discovery" in my opinion.

I don't really understand what you mean by "a way to avoid a real discovery". How would this result in avoiding any real discovery? The responses, and all evidence, will be publicly available.