Quote from: amincd on February 08, 2015, 05:44:33 AM

It seems like there a very high proportion of those against this sensible protocol adjustment are advocates of altcoins.

Icebreaker wants a permanent 1 MB block size limit and for Bitcoin to lose 60% of its market share to altcoins.

The best course of action for Bitcoin (not altcoins), is for this artificial 1 MB restriction to be lifted, as Satoshi intended, and the current lead developer, Gavin Andresen, intends.

I've given numerous reasons why larger blocks are necessary for Bitcoin's success, as have others. You're more interested in your personal attacks to deflect the issue, because you're not here to honestly debate the issue. You're here to advocate for your altcoin.

Is Mircea Popescu also against the 20MB hard fork because he's here to advocate for his altcoin?

No, he's 100% anti-altcoin. Is davout an altcoin advocate too? He must be, because he opposes the 20MB hard fork! Right?

See how stupid you look when you try to infer motivations rather than discuss objective facts?

Now tell us again why you favor Nash Equilibrium for pools, but not for distribution of value accross blockchains.

Oh wait, you can't! Cheesy

I've repeatedly said I want Bitcoin to be the dominant crypto. I used metaphors like 'gold standard' and 'backbone.'

But you still think I somehow don't "share the interests of the majority of the Bitcoin community."

That's BS; like you I've been here since mid 2011.

What part of

Quote

"The overall market for crypto currencies should grow so fast that Bitcoin's relative position among the sector is moot, except to you Maximalist partisan religious types."

is so hard to understand?

Ah I see, you're just wallowing in the usual Maximalist partisan religious type nonsense.

Carry on!