Quote from: traincarswreck on February 09, 2015, 06:45:32 AM

Nash's thesis of ideal money is that by extensively studying the history of money we can realize how to extrapolate a solution that will lead us into the next evolution of it.

Then he perfectly describes bitcoin.

And then of course an anonymous paper arises because that is how we implement experiments to theories right (peer review?)?

Satoshi isn't a real person. I am sorry, your religious is only that.

Satoshi Nakamoto is not John Nash. Nash is 86 years old. Please discuss your fringe theories in a different thread. This is really not the place to be pushing them. We're discussing something serious, and important for Bitcoin and the future of cryptocurrency, and you're trying to get everyone to listen to your weird theories about Satoshi's identity, and why this somehow means we shouldn't allow Bitcoin to scale.

Quote from: CoinCidental on February 09, 2015, 06:09:58 AM

7 TRANSACTIONS PER SECOND ...........SAYS IT ALL REALLY
Bitcoin is already deemed unsuitable for some projects (lighthouse etc ) because the blocks not capable

dont be tricked by any fools who argue monero or litecoin or some alt will have to be used.theyre only against removing this restriction because they already own the alts they would like to replace btc

Exactly. It's not exactly a coincidence that most of those vigorously arguing against the hard fork in this thread are involved in altcoins. They're not in favour of Bitcoin gaining more competitive advantages, and they've all but admitted it already.

And it's only 3 transactions per second, not 7.