Quote from: defunctec on February 12, 2015, 07:32:14 PM

Quote from: girino on February 12, 2015, 07:30:30 PM

Quote from: njs811 on February 12, 2015, 07:24:57 PM

Quote from: girino on February 12, 2015, 07:23:41 PM

Quote from: njs811 on February 12, 2015, 07:21:29 PM

Quote from: girino on February 12, 2015, 07:18:41 PM

Quote from: njs811 on February 12, 2015, 07:09:16 PM

Which is why we need a name change. If we call it masternodes then it will look identical to DRK, and even appear that we stole from them.

it IS identical to DRK MasterNodes. Its an identical masternode, coded from scratch, but still the same. And we did borrow it from them, even part of the code. So stop sweeping it under the carpet.

Quote

Spreadnodes, Smartnodes, Decentralized Masternodes, anything different. Without this it will look like a scam coin.

We will look like a scam coin if we do the same thing, with a shared code base, but a different name.

Didn't you read what Mr. Spread just said?

Yes, he did say exactly what i said: it is an implementation from scratch of the same thing.

From scratch. That is the definition of a new item. Building it from the ground up. Like building a car from the ground up. When that happens you never end up with the same car. Another popular phrase: back to the drawing board. New idea, new name.

Edit: This is no different than SpreadX11 or X11. Similar code, but 1 major difference!

Well, X11 is a good example. You are saying that my miner and wolf0 optimized miner do not mine X11 because we coded them from the ground up? So my miner should be called G11 and his W11?

Why not?

Yea, it would not be at all unreasonable to distinguish the difference. So everyone knows whose miner they are using.