Quote from: e1ghtSpace on February 12, 2015, 07:48:11 PM

Quote from: MyFarm on February 12, 2015, 07:40:54 PM

Quote from: njs811 on February 12, 2015, 07:09:16 PM

Quote from: Mr. Spread on February 12, 2015, 06:49:43 PM

Quote from: defunctec on February 12, 2015, 06:14:42 PM

Quote from: Mr. Spread on February 12, 2015, 06:02:03 PM

Quote from: defunctec on February 12, 2015, 05:56:53 PM

He then takes the MN code and changes that also.

I don't take and change MN code, masternode implementation in SpreadCoin is my own.

Your implementation uses transaction locking, block reward for MN?

That's basically DRK MN.

But, i know you have changed the code allot, and don't consider it yourself to be "taken".
The trolls will not agree.

I will say this one more time, I didn't change DarkCoin masternode code, I simply do not use it. Current implementation of SpreadCoin masternodes is very different from DarkCoin, athough DarkCoin is moving in the right direction so it will be less different in the future.

Which is why we need a name change. If we call it masternodes then it will look identical to DRK, and even appear that we stole from them. Spreadnodes, Smartnodes, Decentralized Masternodes, anything different. Without this it will look like a scam coin.

I'd personally be ok with [something] masternodes. I call them "Spreadcoin masternodes". If you want something catchier than that and Mr. Spread agrees to it, fine. But, "masternode" needs to remain in the name.

Super masternode
Dynamic masternode
Spreadcoin masternode

Stuff like that is fine.

Spreadnode? Nope.

I like dynamic masternode. I hate spreadnode. What is the node spreading? nothing.

The idea is that it is a decentralized masternode. Or Spread around more evenly. Spreadnode.