Quote from: PhantomPhreak on February 16, 2015, 01:23:56 AM

Quote from: delulo on February 15, 2015, 09:22:08 PM

Quote

As with its original BitLicense proposal, DFS will accept comments, but only for thirty days in this round. At the expiration of those thirty days, DFS will likely prepare a final version and then publish it in the state Register. DFS extended the last comment period in response to industry outcries for more time. I doubt that there will be an extension granted, so if you plan to file a comment, it should be done quickly.

Who should file a comment? Altcoin developers might want the final rule to more clearly define what it means to administer a digital currency. Multisig developers might ask for a clearer definition of custody, controlling or holding. They might even argue for a specific exemption.

http://www.coindesk.com/bitlicense-2-0-latest-revisions-mean-bitcoin-businesses/

Would the Counterparty team want to clarify things here?

I don't know what kind of clarification you're looking for. I don't have any comment to make on that article or BitLicense. (Obviously, we don't administer XCP or any other currency.)

If I'd be the judge I also would say you don't administrate it but that term (administrate) is so vague that a request for clarification would bring more legal certainty which is also what the article suggests.