Quote from: DieJohnny on February 18, 2015, 04:28:18 AM

Quote from: R2D221 on February 17, 2015, 01:42:38 PM

Quote from: DieJohnny on February 17, 2015, 05:31:56 AM

Quote from: R2D221 on February 17, 2015, 05:15:13 AM

Quote from: DieJohnny on February 17, 2015, 05:11:08 AM

Uhh no you would be completely wrong. I only need one scenario where it is useful. You have it backwards.

If I'm a criminal and I find a flaw in the legal system, do you think I would still go the obvious way and get caught? Once there's a flaw, everyone will start to use it and the system is just a big curtain. Unless the flaw can be fixed (and there's no way to fix coin mixing as far as I'm aware), then all effort is futile.

I didn't say what i want is a solution, it is simply a way to do some basic due dilligence.

Yes, but your proposal will help filter exactly zero criminals in the long run, because everyone will be using mixing services before spending their stolen coins.

zero says you, more than zero says me

How many more than zero? That's the important issue here.