Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 06:48:55 PM

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 06:27:00 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 06:19:46 PM

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 01:06:43 AM

Quote from: Mcqueen44 on February 21, 2015, 06:05:19 PM

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

Well, remove the shit and it says...

Quote from: cheako911 on February 21, 2015, 01:06:43 AM

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario. The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 1.0002002
Outputs: 0.99997 BTC 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
Included In Blocks 344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
Included In Block 344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good. Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network. A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC. Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

However there is no proof included in the previous statements, they tell a good story, but are empty of any justification. Don't be taken in by sweet talk, only trust the long strings of encoded data. Without the data backing this Ponzi up, they truly would be just scamming everybody.

Thank god you aren't a journalist Cheesy

"THIS JUST IN: A SCAM THATS BEEN KNOWN FOR ALMOST 100 YEARS IS STILL A SCAM!"