Quote from: username18333 on February 21, 2015, 09:50:27 PM

Quote from: BitMos on February 21, 2015, 09:25:52 PM

Quote from: username18333 on February 21, 2015, 09:01:38 PM

Quote from: username18333 on February 19, 2015, 02:51:34 AM

. . .

Quote from: R. I. M. Dunbar. Co-Evolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language In Humans (uned. preprint). 19 Feb. 235. link=http://www.uvm.edu/~pdodds/files/papers/others/1993/dunbar1993a.pdf

Primates are, above all, social animals. This has inevitably led to the suggestion that such intense sociality is functionally related to the exceptional cognitive abilities of these animals, as reflected in their unusually large brains (Jolly 1969, Humphrey 1976, Kummer 1982, Byrne & Whiten 1988). This claim is supported by the finding that mean group size is directly related to relative neocortical volume in nonhuman primates (Sawaguchi & Kudo 1990, Dunbar 1992a). These analyses suggest that although the size of the group in which animals live in a given habitat is a function of habitat-specific ecologically-determined costs and benefits (see for example Dunbar 1988, 1992b), there is a species-specific upper limit to group size which is set by purely cognitive constraints: animals cannot maintain the cohesion and integrity of groups larger than a size set by the information- processing capacity of their neocortex.

(Red colorization mine.)

It would seem that the limit of a Homo sapiens sapiens capacity to uniquely categorize other ones begets, in the context of the current population thereof of Earth, its extrapolation of a singular identity over, even, many millions thereof.

thank you for sharing this intelligent link. From it I get a different interpretation, it's just that if you want to maintain bigger group you need tougher law and application. Understand that for the west million warriors army is quite new, in China it's old new. that's explain a lot I think. The westerners are ill prepared, maybe their indoctrination fucked their brains... you know their neuropath got corrupted with all the lies (that for pre 45) now you add the toxins, and it's possible that their brains got even less performing than those of apes.

A Homo sapiens sapiens cannot be made to travel at superluminal speeds unassisted through tougher law and application (BitMos). In that same way, there is little reason to expect such reinforcement to have one exceed other physical (here, neurological) limitations of the subspecies (e.g., the maximum of unique definitions of other, particular Homo sapiens sapiens it can maintain at once).

I think that to continue this discussion we need to switch to Chinese, ie the Language of what you are aiming... In Arabic too... but English is too weak as a language to aboard it complexly. In short : IN GOD WE TRUST.