Quote from: Carlton Banks on February 22, 2015, 03:58:39 PM

Quote from: doug_armory on February 22, 2015, 03:22:40 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on February 22, 2015, 09:08:44 AM

Big congratulations, really pleased with this project and where it's heading right now.

One small question: when can we expect more info on the safety of enabling deterministic signing?

[...]Of course, personal opinions don't mean squat. There could be some weird thing I missed. So, for now, Alan's going to take a close look once he has a little free time, and we'll decide from there where to go.

Sounds like a good enough reason to justify the disabling by default, you need at least 10 opinions Cheesy

. But I I know, you mean opinions from people who make it their business to know cryptography from all the theory based angles who can spot signatures leaking information in some way no-one's thought of, etc. I might wait just a while to use it, but it sounds like a good thing in principle (it makes address re-use safer/safe IIRC)

What do you mean by deterministic signing?