Quote from: ValueAccounts on March 02, 2015, 03:16:54 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 27, 2015, 04:35:09 PM

Quote from: ValueAccounts on February 27, 2015, 04:31:17 PM

bump. Escrow will be used. Accounts are not stolen/hacked.

your trust says otherwise Huh

Check the reference. That says otherwise to your comment too.

Quote from: theymos on February 22, 2015, 10:31:48 PM

I think that the account was hacked, though this can never be known for certain.

The IP that posted the loan request from yussuf89's account also posted this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=960603.0
Someone with the same IP was trying to sell another account here, presumably hacked:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=925024.0

yussuf89's password wasn't changed/reset recently except for when marcotheminer did it, so the attacker must have somehow gotten his password. Keylogger or phishing, maybe.

Zeki's IP matches yussuf89.

Since ownership of the account is contested, I'm thinking that I should not restore the account and let people give trust ratings depending on what happens. For example, if marcotheminer needs to eat the entire cost of this when he's mostly not at fault, some people might want to give yussuf89 negative feedback.

Quote from: theymos on February 23, 2015, 07:43:59 PM

I think that marcotheminer should return the account now since it was probably hacked, but everyone should give yussuf89 negative feedback for being unable to stand behind his account's actions unless he pays 50-75% of the loan principle. (This is just my opinion -- I'm not going to try to enforce it.)