Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 23, 2015, 03:27:40 PM

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 23, 2015, 03:14:43 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 23, 2015, 03:05:15 PM

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 23, 2015, 02:29:10 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 23, 2015, 02:18:59 PM

Quote from: NotLambchop on February 23, 2015, 02:13:16 PM

Quote from: billyjoeallen on February 23, 2015, 02:05:32 PM

...I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that...

I lived in several US states allowing me to use violence to protect my property. You [nonviolently] come on my property, I shoot you in the face.
What's wrong with that?

That's why I very specifically wrote "INITIATING" physical violence. Self defense and defense of one's property is not initiation. Can you fucking read or do I have to ignore you again?

By being a sexist bigot you are initiating violence. Stop triggering me brah. Clearly I wouldn't shoot you in the face unless you incited & richly deserved it.

In order to incite you, I would have to have the ability to control your actions with words. Do you lack self control to the degree that I can do that?

You clearly are controlling my actions with words--you call me nigger bitch, I shoot you in the face. What's so hard to understand here?

you also missed this:

Quote

No. "Violence" is not binary, it's very creepy and analog-gradienty. Theft is violence. Farting through silk and not sharing while others starve is violence. Private property is violence. Violence begets violence.

If you have the inability to YOUR OWN actions, then you have a problem.
Your words aren't controlling MY actions. Not anymore. Yer back on the ignore list.

Typical libertard: "Facts and reality contradict my intrinsically inconsistent ideology? Lol, ur ignord!"