Quote from: Quickseller on February 23, 2015, 08:46:00 PM

Quote from: marcotheminer on February 23, 2015, 08:41:59 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on February 23, 2015, 08:40:29 PM

are you sure that is fair to all parties? This results in Marco actually profiting from all this while you would take the entire loss. Additionally accounts controlled Marco were also potentially involved with whoever received funds from your accounts loan.

I think it is. Could you rephrase that last sentence?

you had admitted to be in control of accounts whose owners were the receipants of the loan. Although it is unclear if Marco purchased/took the accounts as collateral before the evidence connecting the accounts to the hack was posted or not. At least this is the case as of now.

Edit: also how is it fair that you take no losses when you are both at fault?

I dont like it either, but if Zeki agrees its not my place to tutor them. The signature checks out (see pic below) Ill remove my rating accordingly.

Quote from: marcotheminer on February 23, 2015, 08:17:21 PM

Quote from: shorena on February 23, 2015, 08:12:11 PM

-snip-
[5] https://blockchain.info/tx/d146bae2c66c88e794842c625f86a39a4b41e1046897d8c8e26368da5f30a9c3

[5] was when the account was already in my control hence why the address withdrawn to is: 16WztVJTanbz2PMBLKckL3a3KLrotBaLok

So you had the account on 03.09.2014[1] after declining a loan on 31.08.2014[2]. Also Whoever had the account is certainly speaking dutch[3]

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=767639.msg8655343#msg8655343
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=750507.msg8608350#msg8608350
[3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615784.msg7485249#msg7485249