All atheists are presumably humanists Since what else could they be?
Humanists do not agree with with rebirth even though the evidence is strong; one may search this thread for 'Eisenbeiss'.
Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?
Two guys played a chess game? That is all the article outlines. One of the guys claims it was not him playing chess, but a dead person. There is nothing beyond that to examine. Not only is that not proof it is not evidence either. It is a claim.
A claim backed up with impressive statistics and Salient Points that (apparently) will not be explained by the skeptics in this thread.
Hey RodeoX I think you missed this post.
Humanists do not agree with with rebirth even though the evidence is strong; one may search this thread for 'Eisenbeiss'.
first case....... chessplaying ghosts
Yes. Correspondence with the dead proven by Prof. Eisenbeiss.Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?
A claim backed up with impressive statistics and Salient Points that (apparently) will not be explained by the skeptics in this thread.
Hey RodeoX I think you missed this post.
The evidence for rebirth does not exist. What exists is the fact that there are similarities between people in life, evidence of genetic memory, and evidence that people can make stories.
