Quote from: BADecker on February 25, 2015, 03:58:08 PM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on February 25, 2015, 02:59:04 PM

All atheists are presumably humanists Since what else could they be?

Humanists do not agree with with rebirth even though the evidence is strong; one may search this thread for 'Eisenbeiss'.

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on November 05, 2014, 08:34:09 PM

Quote from: RodeoX on November 05, 2014, 08:30:51 PM

Quote from: bl4kjaguar on November 05, 2014, 08:12:07 PM

Quote from: tattooist on November 05, 2014, 07:29:04 PM

first case....... chessplaying ghosts

Yes. Correspondence with the dead proven by Prof. Eisenbeiss.

Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?

Two guys played a chess game? That is all the article outlines. One of the guys claims it was not him playing chess, but a dead person. There is nothing beyond that to examine. Not only is that not proof it is not evidence either. It is a claim.

A claim backed up with impressive statistics and Salient Points that (apparently) will not be explained by the skeptics in this thread.

Hey RodeoX I think you missed this post.

The evidence for rebirth does not exist. What exists is the fact that there are similarities between people in life, evidence of genetic memory, and evidence that people can make stories.

That explanation is far from simple as has already been discussed. Search this thread for Eisenbeiss.

Also, your explanation of why everyone needs a ' savior ' is very complicated; it relies on an infallible text and is not open to debate. I already mentioned how faith makes more sense when you have more knowledge, so why do you exclusively trust the doctrine of Paul and ignore the serious possibility that man has changed the teachings?
Where is the REAL explanation for the evidence I have Presented? It will not be found by hiding from the facts of this case. As mentioned, your explanation Would entail a conspiracy without apparent motive. That needs to be explained.