Quote from: CrazyJoker on February 25, 2015, 05:15:56 PM

Quote from: cazkooo on February 25, 2015, 05:10:00 PM

Quote from: CrazyJoker on February 25, 2015, 04:01:06 PM

Quote from: arieq on February 25, 2015, 12:43:27 PM

Quote from: CrazyJoker on February 24, 2015, 08:10:48 PM

Quote from: Harry Hood on February 20, 2015, 01:54:49 AM

I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.

Quote from: Mist on February 20, 2015, 05:05:10 AM

I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.

Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug.

So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?

Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though.

i dont get this, how do you mean by distributing loss among multiple investor?will the losing investor is choosen randomly?

Oops... NO ! That statement was given in comparison to our previous rule where only the last investor was losing. Now, the losing invetors will be the group of last investors whose investment is not covered by other investors. There is no randomness in chosing the losing ones.

I would suggest the minimum amount to deposit at 0.01 BTC from next round. 0.0005 BTC is too low to play a Ponzi Game.