None of the coins were posted as "solvent".  There was a list of insolvent coins, along with the now-famous timeline showing when each coin was apparently stolen.  There was also a list of coins on each customer's portfolio page showing how many 1.0 coins they have.  The insolvent coins were "credited" as jelly beans and the apparently-solvent coins just stated a 1.0 figure.

I have a bunch of DRK and others.  I mentioned UTC as an example of a coin that would synch, but I didn't actually have any of those.  Not having access to the website, I couldn't give an example of another synchable coin that I considered to be solvent based upon it (1) not being on the insolvent list and (2) being listed as a 1.0 balance with no associated jelly beans.

But for the record, you are now saying DRK and UTC are both completely insolvent and this fact was completely unknown up until this point.

Having access to the figures when performing an audit is overrated.

Give me a break.  You scatter crumbs of information all over the Internet and sneak un-dated updates into the OP text, and then expect each of your customers to go on an Easter Egg hunt?  You do realise that you could just as easily copy/paste the information to this thread to avoid people having to constantly monitor 37,000 locations and carefully check text for sneaky updates all the time?  Who does that?  If a copy/paste into this thread is too much of an effort, or is impractical for some reason, then maybe an update here that says "look over there for an update" would work equally well.  That would take hardly any time out of your busy IRC social schedule and would save lot of customers the hassle of having to do "due diligence" every single day in the hope that there might be an update somewhere on the Internet sometime this year.

It's a win/win.  We get updates and you get to avoid having me in your face demanding updates.

My mistake.  I mistook you for the speaker who I now recall was King Dragon.  He was the one who set out the "theft" timeline and told us which coins were "stolen", when and apparently by whom etc.  Oddly enough the coins you are now auditing as depleted were not mentioned at all in the list, either in the speech nor elsewhere.

That suggestion was made so that we could see which coins you are auditing and bringing online.  Once done, we could clearly see which were skipped due to coin death and which were fully solvent or newly insolvent etc.  But if you don't want to do that then another method of keeping us fully informed would be equally acceptable.

What's not acceptable is to have no information for six months and then come back and say "oops - all the coins are newly insolvent now.  We promise we didn't cash them out months ago, as per the speculation."

I have no intention of attempting to extract information about any plans beyond what you intend to do to get the "solvent" coins released.  It seems that those previously-"solvent" coins are all insolvent now, so my use of quotes around the word "solvent" throughout this thread has been fully justified.

So, to sum up, your bottom line message is three-fold:  Firstly, CR2 is now to be considered utterly insolvent apart from the coins listed on the OP, but there's no need to be upset about newly-announced losses as we weren't considered entitled to the coins anyway.  Secondly, there are some top secret plans afoot (that have absolutely nothing to do with website colour changes) that will make us all feel better about it all once announced in one of 37,000 possible places (but not here in this thread of course).  Thirdly, anyone who asks for updates is a troll.

Got it.  My unentitled and unworthy self thanks you for the info.  I think.