Quote from: CSL on February 25, 2015, 11:33:56 PM

Quote from: JCJr222 on February 25, 2015, 12:39:03 PM

I cannot (for security reasons) post my list of CR 1.0 coins publicly.

Based upon this spreadsheet, DRK was never posted as solvent.

None of the coins were posted as "solvent". There was a list of insolvent coins, along with the now-famous timeline showing when each coin was apparently stolen. There was also a list of coins on each customer's portfolio page showing how many 1.0 coins they have. The insolvent coins were "credited" as jelly beans and the apparently-solvent coins just stated a 1.0 figure.

I have a bunch of DRK and others. I mentioned UTC as an example of a coin that would synch, but I didn't actually have any of those. Not having access to the website, I couldn't give an example of another synchable coin that I considered to be solvent based upon it (1) not being on the insolvent list and (2) being listed as a 1.0 balance with no associated jelly beans.

But for the record, you are now saying DRK and UTC are both completely insolvent and this fact was completely unknown up until this point.

Quote from: JCJr222 on February 25, 2015, 10:17:22 PM

I have taken over the audits, but I have absolutely no access to the wallets to confirm.

Having access to the figures when performing an audit is overrated.

Quote from: JCJr222 on February 25, 2015, 10:17:22 PM

I never stated that any updates have been listed in this thread. Reread what I actually said, and think long and hard about it so you understand before bringing it up again. The OP has links to all of the places we have been updating the community. The info is there, plain as day, and everyone else seemed to figure it out. I don't understand how you seem to be the one person who can't figure it out. They are not hidden, you simply failed to do your own due-diligence as I pointed out before. This is not my fault, and I am sorry that you seem to think it is.

Give me a break. You scatter crumbs of information all over the Internet and sneak un-dated updates into the OP text, and then expect each of your customers to go on an Easter Egg hunt? You do realise that you could just as easily copy/paste the information to this thread to avoid people having to constantly monitor 37,000 locations and carefully check text for sneaky updates all the time? Who does that? If a copy/paste into this thread is too much of an effort, or is impractical for some reason, then maybe an update here that says "look over there for an update" would work equally well. That would take hardly any time out of your busy IRC social schedule and would save lot of customers the hassle of having to do "due diligence" every single day in the hope that there might be an update somewhere on the Internet sometime this year.

It's a win/win. We get updates and you get to avoid having me in your face demanding updates.

Quote from: JCJr222 on February 25, 2015, 10:17:22 PM

What is this "speech in front of a huge three-letter subliminal message (CON)" you are referring to? I have given no speeches in front of anyone. I think you may be confused as to who you are actually speaking to.

My mistake. I mistook you for the speaker who I now recall was King Dragon. He was the one who set out the "theft" timeline and told us which coins were "stolen", when and apparently by whom etc. Oddly enough the coins you are now auditing as depleted were not mentioned at all in the list, either in the speech nor elsewhere.

Quote from: JCJr222 on February 25, 2015, 10:17:22 PM

I will also NOT be releasing a list of the next 10 coins as you demanded, not requested. Since the latest events, we have switched gears a bit regarding repayment plans.

That suggestion was made so that we could see which coins you are auditing and bringing online. Once done, we could clearly see which were skipped due to coin death and which were fully solvent or newly insolvent etc. But if you don't want to do that then another method of keeping us fully informed would be equally acceptable.

What's not acceptable is to have no information for six months and then come back and say "oops - all the coins are newly insolvent now. We promise we didn't cash them out months ago, as per the speculation."

Quote from: JCJr222 on February 25, 2015, 10:17:22 PM

Plenty of work is occurring behind the scenes. There is absolutely nothing you can say or do to extract that information from ANY CryptoRush employee at this time. The possibilities presented to us at this time are too great to possibly risk losing out on because you demand answers. Any subsequent posts you make, you are essentially wasting your breath. It is what it is.

I have no intention of attempting to extract information about any plans beyond what you intend to do to get the "solvent" coins released. It seems that those previously-"solvent" coins are all insolvent now, so my use of quotes around the word "solvent" throughout this thread has been fully justified.

So, to sum up, your bottom line message is three-fold: Firstly, CR2 is now to be considered utterly insolvent apart from the coins listed on the OP, but there's no need to be upset about newly-announced losses as we weren't considered entitled to the coins anyway. Secondly, there are some top secret plans afoot (that have absolutely nothing to do with website colour changes) that will make us all feel better about it all once announced in one of 37,000 possible places (but not here in this thread of course). Thirdly, anyone who asks for updates is a troll.

Got it. My unentitled and unworthy self thanks you for the info. I think.

You're welcome. You are nowhere near close, but if you are now satisfied that's good enough for me