Quote from: dogie on February 26, 2015, 10:30:24 PM

Quote from: kingcolex on February 26, 2015, 10:26:46 PM

Quote from: dogie on February 26, 2015, 10:24:12 PM

Quote from: jimmothy on February 26, 2015, 10:18:43 PM

Guy you're wasting your time. Unless you pay Dogie, he's not going to give you the same preferential treatment as Bitmain.

And I provided preferential treatment how?

Quote from: kingcolex on February 26, 2015, 10:14:12 PM

Quote from: dogie on February 26, 2015, 10:12:02 PM

Quote from: kingcolex on February 26, 2015, 09:59:08 PM

He is (implying a )threat you that if you keep asking about it he will lower your score on ethical. (Kinda shitty dogie, how about ethical stay based on how they treat customers and not how they post in your threads?)

That's not what I'm saying or implying. Refer you back to the NDA part and why I can't explain what I'm actually talking about in public.

Says more than I can figure.

No idea what that means

What it means is that you've set up NDA's about ratings and they're affecting what you can or do, since I have no more information than that just saying you have an NDA says more than I can figure. It could mean you're giving special treatment or they did wrong shit and you can't say it but I have no clue because you signed paperwork.

Ah right. tldr:

1) Guy made me sign an NDA, something I did so I could get the full information on why their preorder of SP30 went south in order to fairly rate them.
2) Unfortunately, that NDA has no expiry time nor any reasonable basis for me to break it.
3) That means that I can't release information on detailed explanations of some ratings without adding liability due to the presence of that NDA.

I would happily void that NDA if Guy would allow it, but I highly doubt he will.

I didn't "make you sign NDA". You didn't object signing the NDA.
We have private dispute which I don't see what it has to do with this thread., at all.

Stop BS-ing and fix our rating. If we'll take preorders again, change it immediately back.