Quote from: backslash on February 27, 2015, 07:52:33 PM

Quote from: error on February 27, 2015, 07:43:14 PM

Quote from: backslash on February 27, 2015, 07:07:04 PM

check this out: http://harald.hoyer.xyz/files/bitcoin-0.10.0-1.fc21.src.rpm .. bitcoind without openssl-compat on F21 .. only with libsecp256k1

Someone built 0.10.0 with a highly bastardized version of my 0.8.5 specfile? And also disabled a bunch of stuff, like bitcoin-qt, libbitcoinconsensus, the command line utilities...

I'll have a play later with whatever this process actually builds, and see if it can be better integrated. But the real holdup isn't libsecp256k1, it's Red Hat Legal.

Yeah, sorry.. I just wanted the server without any openssl modifications.

That's fine, I want to get rid of openssl too. When I tried a test build (a few weeks ago against an RC) it failed, so I kept it. But secp256k1 still needs a blessing from Red Hat Legal. See BZ#1021898.