Quote from: klove on February 28, 2015, 05:01:34 PM

Quote from: Bit_Happy on February 28, 2015, 04:50:28 PM

Quote from: klove on February 28, 2015, 04:25:39 PM

Quote from: BitcoinBJ on February 28, 2015, 04:16:15 PM

Quote from: elm on February 28, 2015, 07:13:02 AM

Quote from: BitcoinBJ on February 28, 2015, 06:14:55 AM

Quote from: klove on February 28, 2015, 05:19:52 AM

Yeah I went to check this site out and was going to make a small deposit but I saw 6:5 blackjack and said F that place. I'll go play on a site that pays blackjack at 3:2

And you made an account just to troll this post or what?

I ave no new account and can tell you that a player wants to see 3:2 and not 6:5. but you as OP has to decide
what rules you will offer.

Yes, but it can be done in a respectful way as you have done. The other person who made a comment what disrespectful for absolutely no reason.

Do you really feel like you should be respected offering the worst odds blackjack game on the planet? LOL.

Your game has over a 2% house edge when the norm is way under 1%.

Let's review:

6:5 blackjack - advantage to the house - adds 1.4% to house edge over standard 3:2 blackjack

No double after split - yet another house advantage which decreases player odds

Dealer hits soft 17 - again adds more house edge

No resplits

I could go on but every single rule you have favors the house, not one player friendly rule in your game.

I've never seen a blackjack game this bad.

FYI: You can double after more than two cards, also hit after splitting aces, both favoring the player.
Simply changing the 6/5 BJ would make a huge difference.

Yah maybe youre right I didn't get that far in testing it, it would be nice if there was a blackjack house rules page on the website. Either way those rule variations you mentioned above dont take much off the 2% I calculated it at so maybe its 1.7% , like you said get rid of the 6:5 and its a decent game then. Players shouldnt settle for 6:5 blackjack just because you can double after 3 cards or hit split aces.

I agree.
Also, it's a fast game and the server uptime seems fine, so better rules would be great.