Quote from: onemorexmr on March 02, 2015, 05:00:07 PM

Quote from: Zeta0S on March 02, 2015, 04:57:31 PM

Quote from: R2D221 on March 02, 2015, 04:39:47 PM

Quote from: Zeta0S on March 02, 2015, 04:37:19 PM

Quote from: R2D221 on March 02, 2015, 04:35:05 PM

Quote from: cambda on March 02, 2015, 03:33:56 PM

Quote from: Zeta0S on March 02, 2015, 03:06:22 PM

The Bitcoin wallets getting to big people. And downloading it go to slow, It took me 3 days to download. (I have 200MB up and Down INTERNET connection)

If you keep Bitcoin 1MB block limit, people will be forced to use other altcoins as well, so you basically have to download all blockchains anyway because not everyone is going to accept Bitcoin, so you save nothing from this point.

Exactly, why don't people understand this?

So making the blocks bigger will fix this?

No. What I (and cambda, hopefully) am trying to say, is that you will need a whole lot of disk space, no matter what solution is chosen. There's no way to escape that.

This is on acceptable, this will let bitcoin fail in the long run. I suggest some super-nodes or something els..

luckily there is already a solution called pruning. just not implemented atm.

btw. the current blockchain is around 30gb. do you really think this is a problem?
even 1tb disk space is no problem with current hardware.

problem is bandwith...

Both is a problem right now.