Quote from: Andrew Vorobyov on July 30, 2012, 06:13:45 PM

Quote from: mav on June 20, 2012, 01:23:58 AM

bitcoind listtransactions "*" 1 X
for x starting at 0 and increasing by 1 until the result matches a transaction I've already encountered before

Genius!

Not really ... Not only, he generates lots of RPC calls, but he will also miss transactions if a new transaction comes in while he increments X ...

Example:

bitcoind listtransactions "*" 1 0
{... hash: "fe46e7a8..."' }

while

bitcoind listtransactions "*" 1 1
{... hash: "fe46e7a8..."' }

So, you would break here although, there could be another new transaction after the hash you already know ...

Imho this listtransaction model is crap ... it make things much more difficulty than it has to be. The newest transaction is always at index 0 is stupid ...