Quote from: Paul Revere on March 05, 2015, 12:00:14 AM

Quote from: jimmothy on March 04, 2015, 11:49:36 PM

Quote from: Coin Brief on March 04, 2015, 11:42:28 PM

I thought about digging through all of these emails, updating the article and/or writing a new one...but, I hardly think that is even necessary at this point. I guess it is time to get started on one detailing the end / aftermath of GAW's collapse, and moving on to other subjects. That is, unless I can get even more insight than these leaks can provide.

I think you should still write an article that way hashtalkers will see it. (they will never dig through this thread)

It's also just a lot of info to digest, would be nice if someone would pick out the important parts and summarize it.

Not only that, but the general consensus on HT is that the Coin Brief article was libelous and that you will soon be retracting your story.

Edit to add: I got ninja'd by Jimmothy. I was looking for that thread on HT, there are a bunch of idiots on there going on about how the article is false, even after PC fan admitted he was wrong and resigned from HT.

This is the thread on HT: https://hashtalk.org/topic/32996/coinbrief-article-update/100

Found another post I was thinking of:
http://i.imgur.com/soXdu65.jpg
https://hashtalk.org/topic/33111/what-exactly-is-going-on-can-someone-post-an-unbiased-account/11

Oh, that reminds me. I didn't watch the newest episode of "Better Call Saul". I've been too busy with all of this...

I have to make time for that tonight.

Quote from: jimmothy on March 04, 2015, 11:59:18 PM

Quote from: Vlad2Vlad on March 04, 2015, 11:49:49 PM

Quote from: Coin Brief on March 04, 2015, 11:42:28 PM

I thought about digging through all of these emails, updating the article and/or writing a new one...but, I hardly think that is even necessary at this point. I guess it is time to get started on one detailing the end / aftermath of GAW's collapse, and moving on to other subjects. That is, unless I can get even more insight than these leaks can provide.

Coinbrief,

Thanks for posting.

Can you comment on the screenshot posted here yesterday where you guys said the leaked emails you wrote an article about were in fact faked and you were certain of it.

Please verify if you guys did in fact verify those leaked emails were faked and if not please add some color regarding these other recently leaked emails.

Thank you!

Coinbrief never said the leaked emails were faked. You are probably referring to this post made by a user who is NOT Coinbrief:

http://i.imgur.com/MSh52NH.png

After this was posted the OP admitted he was an idiot and resigned from his position as paid mouthpiece. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg10647824#msg10647824

Vlad, I've already responded to that when you posted it before. We have NEVER said that the emails were fake. Others have claimed that, without even the slightest shred of evidence, but we certainly have not. Want to know why? Because they are not fake. The DKIM-signatures prove that they are real, and we have since been in contact with the one who released the emails, and can confirm that the source is not a "hacker". The emails were obtained legitimately.