Quote from: inBitweTrust on March 05, 2015, 04:31:51 PM

I read the link you provided and its not even worth rebutting because of the lack of quality. I will leave it to the readers to compare the evidence that we have been providing and the little bit of evidence that doesn't managed to get censored because it isn't parroting the company line on a forum controlled by the company whose these allegations are concerning.

Quote from: barabbas on March 05, 2015, 04:09:11 PM

Do you want me to expose that you were on the crusade long before there was no evidence whatsoever? uh, ah. there's still none whatsoever and, now, plenty of real evidence to the CONTRARY.

Hehehe...

What is there to expose? I have been quite open with my crusades against fraudsters including GAW from the start. Before paycoin it is quite likely that I was warning people about red flags in GAW cloud mining scheme and how they were likely running a fractional reserve ponzi.

Let me repeat what I have claimed over and over again:
The only bias I may have is slightly towards bitcoin as 99% of my investments are there. I do not necessarily prefer PoW above PoS but prefer a mixture of the two. I have no problem with investing in an alt if it fulfills certain roles that bitcoin cannot fulfill and even have my eyes on a couple right now. I have never done business with GAW or paycoin so it isn't personal and my attacks aren't specifically focused towards paycoin as I have a long post history of attacking other alts and cloud mining ponzi's. I stand to gain nothing from warning others about paycoin besides trying to salvage a little reputation with the crypto community. Paycoin would have failed even if no one warned others about this scam because there exists multiple fundamental problems with the coin and the people running it. Everyone in the crypto community loses with these types of scams.

You are talking here to someone who long ago established THE WALL OF SHAME precisely for that purpose, not a later day pretended "savior of innocents". You were after payCoin from the get go, NOT because it could be a scam -a foregone conclusion on your part, because you had decided on it before there was not just no evidence (there's still none), but because you were, like so many others, committed to try to stop its progress/success by ANY means necessary-. You had a very clear interest, just like so many others, including those who protested from positions of responsibility in several established coin projects, in provoking the failure of the PayCoin/PayBase project. To the point of making of it an insane, vicious, absolutely unfair crusade of very damaging proportions for crypto in general, not just PayCoin or GAW. Your/their fudding stopped, actually, the Gyft deal, we now know, which not only was originally in place but was also to make PayCoin spendable everywhere AS ADVERTISED. There was -as posted by me here- no SEC investigation. But enough crazy nuts, like you, bothered the SEC and downloaded the request for information that they HAD to investigate... and investigation, mind you, which will bring whatever it brings but it is not a foregone conclusion -as you again use- of ANY wrongdoing at all.

It isn't PayCoin/PayBase what is wrong or causes damage to crypto; it is you and the vicious, sick spreaders of falsehoods for their self serving agenda, the ones that try to legitimize the obvious false accusations and faked documents, the cancer of crypto. Including those despicable, envious representatives of "established coins", shit coins in fact the lot of them. It is YOU who, still, continue the vicious hunting down still with no evidence whatsoever, still with no serious reporting about it from any, any at all, of the reputed net outlets, much less from the serious press who did the damage, who do the damage and make it impossible for a project that was meant to be a gigantic leap forward towards massive adoption, to progress/succeed.

I'd be the first to support any and all indications of possible scams or cons, leveling the playing field against the crooks, anonymous or not who cry FUD at every instance trying to hide their scams. No need of so called solid evidence if we are to have a level playing field AND protect innocents from them, but when you and all those either produce or thoroughly support FALSE, FAKED documents, that's a line that should never be crossed. That's what you have been doing since the get go. NOT warning of "red flags" at all -which would be a positive thing to do-, but supporting the lynching by a vicious mob determine to make the project fail by any means necessary. Actually, being (a very active) part of it. Big difference, comprende?