Quote from: vk3ukf on March 06, 2015, 06:41:51 AM

Quote from: AirWolf on March 06, 2015, 12:42:47 AM

maybe in good faith, but responsible anyway.

Why do I get the feeling that you have not read the T.O.S. at Havelock.

When I read through it, I was under the impression that not a single person at Havelock is or can be held responsible or liable for anything that you may lose on the Havelock trading platform.

What is this, " but responsible anyway" bizo?

If I am missing something rather large, please do point it out.

P.S. @Airwolf, you mention several times CNN, I understand this to mean CableNewsNetwork.
Then after several posts of CNN it changed to CCN??
I understand CCN to mean CryptoCurrencyNews.
Which is it/ one, the other, or both?

Amhash announced that our profits were guaranteed and shielded against risks.

Acceptable risks are things like; sudden increase of electricity price, share price fluctuations,
difficulty increase, very low btc price, and natural disasters.
Not getting scammed by the company you invest.
If havelock tos says; you should be okay with scam, should we be okay with that?
Do you advice to embrace scam?
No one invests to get scammed, do you?

Havelock is responsible for hiding information from their customers, not announcing critical information timely.
Just like Amhash, Rockminer and Asicminer.
None of them seem to have even a healthy communication and relationship.
They all deny responsibility and act like they are not related to the issue.