Quote from: Kuriso on March 07, 2015, 01:15:12 AM

Quote from: kazuki49 on March 07, 2015, 12:52:52 AM

Quote from: Stealthcoin on March 07, 2015, 12:51:19 AM

Quote from: kazuki49 on March 07, 2015, 12:47:50 AM

Quote from: Kuriso on March 07, 2015, 12:45:16 AM

Quote from: smooth on March 07, 2015, 12:36:10 AM

snip

The Monero insiders had nothing to do with the crippled miner, it came from bytecoin and it was Monero who fixed it, but more to the point it didn't affect the supply at all. Unless you were around during the first month or two it doesn't affect you in the slightest. Someone was going to mine those coins in a few months (roughly 5% percent of the total supply, just as planned) after all.

snip

OOH so monero had an unfair launch... miners with the optimized miner got a ton more coins than miners with the shitty one? hmmm so someone had an advantage and some one had a disadvantage.... Sounds unfair to me. Oh, where did all those coins go?

I bought them so its fairly distributed Tongue

kuriso is known xmr hater on polo trollbox, stealthcoin is a known xmr hater on this forum and the rest defending this scam are letting their bags talk.

please make it more obvious.

If you look closely you will notice that i don't like Darkcoin either.. but its not about that which matters is Bitcoiners are playing dirty tricks again.

fair enough, market manipulation will always exist, one thing we should not tolerate is emission manipulation.

"one thing we should not tolerate is emission manipulation" True, deliberate emission manipulation is a problem. Dark launched and had an issue. They fixed it. What has to be determined is if that issue was deliberate or a mistake. No code is ever perfect. There will always be issues and fixes for those issues. Was it deliberate? I honestly don't think so but who am I? I'm just a monero 'hater' lol (trolling the above label as a xmr hater).

On the other hand, we know for a fact that monero was launched with a deliberately reduced miner for the general public and an optimized miner for the devs. The original devs cashed out their huge profits and left the community holding bags. Luckily a team stepped up to take it over.

Prove DRK's error was a deliberate mistake aimed at ripping off the community and you'll have a case.

Ask yourself, why would a developer purposely release a coin with no future goals or intentions at the time, with 500 coins per block, on a linux only release, then drastically cut the block reward several times over after a few hours have passed, leaving over 2million coins mined by a few individuals in the span of a few hours? The instamine was intended. There is literally no other explanation.